Tuesday, 28 October 2014

Great Films: The Lady Eve (1941)











http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f0/1941.lady.eve.jpg/220px-1941.lady.eve.jpg 



You see, Hopsy, you don't know very much about girls. The best ones aren't as good as you probably think they are and the bad ones aren't as bad. Not nearly as bad.”


Preston Sturges' The Lady Eve is one of my favourite films. This screwball comedy follows Jean Harrington (the luminous Barbara Stanwyck) and Charles 'Hopsy' Pike (an adorable Henry Fonda) as they fall in and out (and in) love with each other. Jean and her father are card sharps who decide to con the rich, naïve Charles, who has been up the Amazon for a year studying snakes. Jean and Charles fall in love, but he rejects her after discovering her deceptive behaviour. To teach him a lesson, Jean comes to his house posing as the English 'Lady Eve'. He falls for her (again), but discovers on their wedding night that Eve is not as sweet and innocent as he believes her to be. 


https://d2nh4f9cbhlobh.cloudfront.net/_uploads/galleries/33969/ladyeve1.jpeg

The plot sounds ridiculous, but I always see the plots of screwball comedies as part of the joke; it is not meant to be taken seriously. That being said, in The Lady Eve Sturges is being satirical on issues around gender politics and sexual hypocrisy. Critic David Parkinson, in his book History of Film, argues that Sturges made satires that 'ran contrary to traditional Hollywood values in exposing a range of American foibles'(94). 
 
Charles, highly uneducated in regards to women, judges Jean in black-and-white terms, imagining that because she is a con artist, she did not really love him; that she is completely 'bad.' It is no mistake that Jean is wearing black the night Charles first meets her, or that Eve is decked out in white when she visits Charles' home: that is how Charles sees her/them. 
 
http://s3.amazonaws.com/criterion-production/images/2620-0372bef9aeb8a340be96c2d7c0a97b39/120_127_large.jpg
See anything you like?
 http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/9e/fc/60/9efc6078331c03fd449495665e3d74d4.jpg
 







But Jean/Eve also wears a mixture of blacks and whites as well as greys (or what appear as grey because of the Black-and-White film); she is far more complex than Charles realises. When Jean says that she think she's falling in love with Charles she remarks that 'I'm going to be exactly the way he thinks I am. The way he'd like me to be.' She is wearing white at the time, and wears white that night when he proposes to her. Wearing white as Eve is a nod to this desire to be what he wants her to be, but Jean is now using Charles' ideals against him. 

http://filmfanatic.org/reviews/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Lady-Eve-Gown2.pnghttp://uselessmathematics.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/tumblr_lskdtq3cz91qcxbdxo1_500.png 









  
Sturges, who co-wrote the screenplay was Monckton Hoffe (great name!), litters the film with references to Adam and Eve in the Genesis story. The opening credits have a snake slithering around the titles who occasionally winks at the audience. There is also an apple or two. 

http://annyas.com/screenshots/images/1941/lady-eve-title-screenshot.jpg
Charles is an ophiologist and is travelling with a snake called Emma. One of the first things Jean does when she sees Charles get on the boat is drop an apple on his head. At dinner Charles reads the book Are Snakes Necessary? The most obvious is that Jean calls herself 'Eve' when in disguise.
 
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Henry_Fonda_in_The_Lady_Eve_trailer.JPG 







Charles also falls over several times during the film, and all of those falls are because of Jean/ Eve. Of course, all screwball comedies have some kind of pratfall, but in The Lady Eve it is also an allusion to the 'fall of man', which we all know was the fault of Eve! 

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RCAay3oj_bY/UI1t6v0nkAI/AAAAAAAAPk8/LLv41XeEECk/s1600/Picture+2.png
Jean literally makes Charles fall for her.

In Christianity some Church Fathers interpreted the Genesis story in a rather misogynistic light, casting Eve as the temptress who lured Adam into his downfall. (I've read Genesis, it doesn't actually make any suggestions that way): man's fall is the fault of woman. It is related to the angel/whore dichotomy that still pervades modern thinking. Sturges and Hoffe use the Genesis story to comically point out the flaws of this approach to male/female relationships. Jean, as Eve, sets out to prove to Charles that most women are a mixture of 'good' and 'bad' (what ever that means); and attempts to read paradigms onto people often ends in disaster. 


http://theblondeatthefilm.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/theladyeve-fonda-stanwyck-cuddle-2.png
 
Of course, Jean is not really being altruistic: in the end, all she wants is for Charles to love her for who she is.

In my opinion, the best romantic comedies say something insightful about romantic relationships in a humorous way, usually looking at the power plays between genders. This is what makes The Lady Eve so great. That, and Stanwyck and Fonda.

What other rom-coms do something similar?

2 comments:

  1. This one is really funny and the references to Adam and Eve is not lost on me. I did not understand the ending though. It just does not make any sense to me and for that reason I like it less that it probably deserves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was unfamiliar with “The Lady Eve” but watched and thoroughly enjoyed it. Rom-coms generally aren't my thing, but I like “Joe Versus the Volcano”, in spite of the popular response to it. It explored different roles but in quite a different way from “Eve”. Meg Ryan literally portrays three different characters. I'd hoped to re-watch it before commenting but time constraints have dictated otherwise. The film was interested in the struggles we have with language and, in particular, how language can be as much a barrier as it can a means for authentic relationships. Joe (Tom Hanks) initially struggles to communicate with Ryan's first character. He deteriorates into random, abrupt, fragmented sentences. By contrast, Ryan's final character is the most genuine and down to earth yet – if memory serves – shows the most flagrant disregard for literal accuracy (she even gives Joe a new name). Though I could be way off base here, I haven't seen the film in a few years and am just describing some general impressions that stuck with me.

    ReplyDelete